// [cafeteria]
The New Wellness Marketing Playbook
A marketer’s guide to claims, creators, and proof for the next generation of wellness spending.
Last week our insights team published the Health + Wellness edit of our Next Gen Spenders report series.
It pulled together 237 hours of conversation with 1,400+ Gen Z and Gen Alpha participants who told us how they spend, what they trust, and which products start to feel like a scam in the wellness category.
This playbook turns those signals into better claims, sharper creator briefs, and smarter campaigns for GTM teams trying to stay fluent.
| # | Section | Core question |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | claims need receipts | where is the proof? |
| 02 | influence is not a credential | who can credibly make it? |
| 03 | segment by motive | what is the entry point? |
| 04 | AI can hold the clipboard | is AI staying in its lane? |
01 — Receipts. Proof. Timeline.
Gen Next distrusts wellness claims that feel too perfect, too fast, or too sure of themselves. They do, however, reward restraint (what the product cannot do, what proof exists, and what the customer still has to bring to the table).
“what makes a product believable is not making any wild statements like “take this pill and you’ll lose fat in 30 days” i want something that’ll go alongside my efforts rather than it do all the effort”
what this means for marketers
1/ careful with speed
“Results in 30 days.”
“Results build with consistent use over time.”
If the product works best alongside a behavior — going to the gym, using it consistently, changing a routine, sticking with it over time — say that. This generation understands that good things take time. The promise gets more believable when the brand is honest about what the customer still has to do.
2/ Outside voices
“reviews are very very important to me and I feel like if a product doesn’t have good trustworthy reviews it’s almost a gamble to buy it and in this economy I can’t afford gambles. it has to be a third party website that’s not affiliated with the brand too, I feel like they can skew reviews if it’s their own website”
Brand-site reviews can help, but third-party reviews carry more weight because they feel less filtered. Pull them closer to the claim, especially when the promise is doing heavy lifting.
3/ show off the tradeoffs
A product that works for everyone, instantly and with no caveats, starts to feel fake. Name the pros and cons. Say who it is for, who may not get the best result, what side effects or usage notes matter, and where expectations should be managed.
“Works for all skin types.”
“Best for oily and combination skin; sensitive skin should patch test first.”
4/ Proof should be easy to find.
Research, third-party testing, certifications, real numbers, and outside reviews should live close to the claim. Do not make someone go hunting for the reason to believe.
“For me, for a product to be believable, there has to be unbiased sources affiliated with the product. For example, a product made for health and wellness that is to be consumed, like a supplement or a vitamin or anything like that, must be third-party tested, specifically for things that are known contaminants within the product…”
proof buried in the FAQ, footer, or ingredient page.
proof visible in the ad, PDP hero, packaging, caption, or claim module.
5/ Make before-and-after feel believable.
Use real people, real timelines, and real texture. If you show results, say what else may have actually happened: how many applications, how many weeks or months, and whether the product was used alongside another routine, treatment, or diet.
02 — Influence is not a credential
Young consumers are skeptical of health and wellness advice that looks too polished or too far outside the creator’s actual expertise. In this category, trust compounds when the creator can explain why they are credible enough to make the claim.
22% of participants name no health or wellness creator they actually trust. Some even say the most famous creators are the most suspect.
The Medicube case is the clearest illustration of the pattern. Even with Kardashian and Alix Earle behind the product, one respondent put it plainly:
“I feel like all those people already have beautiful skin and there’s no way to really show it. So I feel like it makes things more believable if I can see real results from real people and not paid promotions.”
Doctor Mike was one of the few creators trusted by a meaningful number of respondents across genders, largely because his authority is obvious: he is an actual doctor.
The task is to find the creator with permission to make the claim.
That permission can come from credentials or lived use. A trainer can talk to a recovery routine. A creator with a visible before-and-after journey can make a skin or fitness product feel more real. But a famous face with perfect skin and a discount code may make the product feel less credible, not more.
Claim-risk ladder
| Risk level | Category examples | Creator requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Low | Taste, convenience, routine fit | Lifestyle creators can work |
| Medium | Sleep, skin, energy, digestion | Lived use + clear explanation required |
| High | Hormones, anxiety, weight, mental health | Expert, clinician, or very careful limits |
03 — Segment by motive
The same wellness product can read as proof, pressure, or scam bait depending on who is looking at it. And that is the trap for brands: one product may need several messages because different audiences need different reasons to care and different objections answered.
Red light therapy is the clearest example in our data.
For some, it is skincare.
“Love it. Great. Everyone does it. Literally everybody that I know does it. I’ve seen benefits to my skin from it and 10 out of 10, 100% recommend. Very into it.”
For others, it is expensive wellness theater.
“first of all it’s creepy, second of all it’s too much like one of those scam LA health nut things. like I’m supposed to have a huge red light bed in my apartment or buy a $100+ mask?? they don’t have that in the blue zones and they’re doing just fine.”
The same product is creating two very different reactions: one person sees visible skin benefits and social proof; another sees cost, hype, and a product that feels out of touch.
The split shows up in the numbers, too: females are more into red light therapy overall. Skin is the #1 reason across genders.
Males are 2x more likely to frame it as recovery, and uniquely flag hair regrowth as a benefit.
“I’m interested in this because I see a lot of people online, whether it’s ordinary people or celebrities, and they really talk about the benefits of red light therapy and how it can help reduce wrinkles and clear your skin, but also help with hair growth and just make your skin ultimately more healthier.”0:00
That changes the job of the message.
| entry point | what they see | what to lead with | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skin / appearance | Red light as visible improvement | realistic timelines, before-and-afters, and reviews from people with similar skin | They are looking for visible proof, but overproduced results can make the claim feel fake |
| Recovery / performance | Red light as a routine tool | use case, cadence, fit with training, and measurable recovery context | They need to understand when to use it, why it belongs in the routine, and what result to watch |
| Skepticism / hype-fatigue | Red light as expensive wellness theater | caveats, third-party proof, and what the product does not promise | They are not waiting to be inspired; they are looking for reasons to dismiss it |
Wellness entry-point map
Red light therapy is just one example. The same exercise applies across wellness: before you decide what to say, figure out what motive the product is serving and what question the audience needs answered.
| Entry point | The question to answer |
|---|---|
| 🔬 Proof | What evidence makes the claim believable? |
| 📅 Routine | Where does this fit in the day? |
| ✨ Appearance | What visible feedback are they watching? |
| 😮💨 Relief | What stress, anxiety, sleep, or decompression need does this answer? |
| 📈 Performance | What number, score, or progress signal matters? |
| 🧐 Skepticism | What would make this feel overhyped, expensive, or fake? |
| 🔁 Occasion | What repeatable moment does the product own? |
*Use these as planning lenses, not fixed consumer segments.
04 — The clipboard? Yes. The lab coat? No.
35% of Gen Next trust AI to build a workout plan, meal plan, or diet approach.
Gen Next is most receptive to AI when the job is practical and bounded. In other words: organize a thought, compare ingredients, build a plan, or make a routine easier to follow.
But the wall is authority.
65% of females rank AI chatbots as their most-distrusted source for health information. Males distrust TikTok most, and 46% also distrust AI.
One respondent drew the line clearly: AI can help her narrow down what to ask a doctor. It cannot be the doctor.
“if I feel like I have something I’m not gonna trust AI to diagnose me, I’m gonna maybe help use AI as a search engine to narrow down what I may have so I can present my suspicions to a doctor…”
| Helpful role | Risky role |
|---|---|
| Pattern spotter: “You mentioned poor sleep three nights this week.” | Diagnoser |
| Comparator: “Here is how these ingredients differ.” | Claim validator |
| Planner: “Here is a workout plan based on your fitness goals.” | Therapist substitute |
| Question generator: “Ask your provider about…” | Testimonial generator |
Where AI can help
The same skepticism shows up in copy. Gen Next can feel when wellness language gets too polished and templated.
“you genuinely can not tell. only thing you can tell is if it sounds like it’s AI. for example, ‘it’s not this, it’s that’ — AI makes things sound like scams.”
AI-coded copy gives Gen Next the ick. Even worse, it can make the promise feel unearned.
Before a wellness message goes live, look for:
Ask us anything
Wellness marketing is getting harder because the audience is getting sharper.
Use this playbook to spot the places where a claim, creator brief, product page, or launch message might need a sharper gut check.
And when you want to know how Gen Z and Gen Alpha actually hear it before the hard launch, bring it to [cafeteria].
- Does this claim sound credible, or does it sound like wellness math?
- Which version of this product page makes the benefit easiest to believe?
- What proof would make this message feel worth trying?
- Which audience motive should we lead with: proof, routine, appearance, relief, performance, skepticism, or occasion?
- What would make this feel trusted, questioned, or dismissed?
